The issue of interpretation is central to contract taw, because a major goat of that body of law is to facilitate the power of self-governing parties to further their shared objectives through contracting. Modern contract law has developed a set of general principles of interpretation that give a place to both objective and subjective elements, and must be applied on an individualized basis. However, a number of narrower black-letter rules give a purely objective and standardized interpretation to certain kinds of expressions, and these standardized interpretations may often differ from the meanings such expressions would be given under the general principles of contract interpretation. These narrower rules, which the author calls expression rules, generally have not been recognized as a special legal category, and partly for that reason have not been critically examined. The author argues that the use of expression rules in contract law is in need of justification. Several possible justifications are explored, and the resulting analysis is applied to various expression rules in the law of offer and acceptance. The author concludes that many expression rules are carry-overs from classical contract law, cannot be justified under modem principles of interpretation, and should be dropped or modified.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.