A crude & dogmatic understanding of logical positivism has spread through the social sciences, including the sociology of law, & committed them to a pseudoscientific ideal of rigor, by which major ends of inquiry, such as objectivity & clarity, are transformed into prerequisites of research. The effect is to sever the social sciences from the intellectual heritage of political, legal, & ethical theory, & to trivialize their concerns & findings. An alternative is to recognize that the intellectual significance of sociological ideas is derivative. The conclusions of social inquiry gain meaning & resonance from what they contribute to the enduring normative concerns of classical philosophy, ie, to the clarification of values, & to the assessment of the conditions & costs of their pursuit. Far from fostering "bias" or indulging obscurity, only a philosophically informed social science can further the larger scientific aims of reducing ignorance & arbitrariness in discourse about human affairs. Accordingly, the sociology of law should resist attempts to draw a sharp line between "pure sociology" & jurisprudence or normative inquiry. The scientific study of law must be jurisprudentially informed, take legal ideas seriously, & reach issues of policy. "Jurisprudential sociology" integrates analytical, descriptive, & normative theory. Jurisprudential issues -- such as the relations of law & politics, law & morality, law & coercion -- point to variable aspects of legal phenomena; to study the conditions affecting such variables is to assess the varying capacity of law to further different kinds of human aspirations. AA.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.