This Article presents a rational actor account of how litigation advice influences the information that reaches the tribunal in an adversary system. The authors conclude that although advice has some disturbing or ambiguous informational effects, on balance providing advice to one or both parties will generally improve the capacity of tribunals to determine who should be sanctioned and who should not. They also identify conditions under which advice is likely to be socially undesirable. The authors apply their account to analyze a range of policy issues, including whether to award fees to private attorneys general, whether to guarantee representation to criminal defendants under the sixth amendment, and whether the due process clause should require access to counsel for claimants in government benefits cases. They also analyze various doctrines of attorney-client confidentiality and rules restricting access to advice about responding to investigations or other questioning.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.