•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The issue of whether marijuana has legitimate medical uses, is addictive, and is actually or potentially physically or psychologically harmful constitute the center of the public policy debate surrounding drug reform. Numerous studies and articles have examined each of those issues. Powerful arguments have been made for and against the liberalization of federal and state marijuana laws.8 The debate centers around three issues: (1) Does marijuana or one of its components (known as cannabinoids) have a legitimate medical use?; (2) Is marijuana or one of its components physically or psychologically harmful?; and (3) Is marijuana or one of its components physically or psychologically addictive? The arguments offered by advocates for and opponents of reform can be summarized in three parts, discussed below.

Included in

Criminal Law Commons

Share

COinS

Link to publisher version (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.15779/Z385H7BT6H

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.