Abstract

Systematic studies of the administration of justice in the United States have stressed either the rational-goal model or the functional-systems model. The former model emphasizes problems with the justice system's formal rules of operation and appears to be the dominant view of appellate judges, lawyers, and law students, while the latter model is concerned with the identification and adaptation of action to the environment and the interests of action within the system.

Comments

Reprinted in Richard Reasons (ed.), Sociology of Law (1980); Stan Stojkovic et al. (eds.) The Administration and Management of Criminal Justice Organizations, eds. 1990, 1994, 1999; Kaihi Rokumoto, ed., Sociology of Law (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers, 2001); Joachim Savelsberg, et al, Criminal Courts (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers, 2007); reprinted in The Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems (Beijing: Beijing University Press).

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.