Abstract

Analyzes the California law regarding cases where parol evidence rule and claims of promissory fraud are in conflict. Details of the case Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association versus Pendergrass; Uses of the evidence of fraud; Issues on the admissibility of the evidence of promissory fraud.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.